<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Tasar\u0131m:<\/strong> Bir \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn tamam\u0131n\u0131n veya bir par\u00e7as\u0131n\u0131n ya da s\u00fcslemesinin \u00e7izgi, \u015fekil, bi\u00e7im, renk, malzeme, y\u00fczey dokusu vs \u00f6zelliklerinin in\u015fa s\u00fcrecindeki mimari ve m\u00fchendislik \u00e7izimleri ile estetik g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm, i\u015flevsellik, kullan\u0131m kolayl\u0131\u011f\u0131, verimlilik, nas\u0131l \u00e7al\u0131\u015faca\u011f\u0131 ve kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n beklentilerine uygun bir \u015fekilde nas\u0131l yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6sterilmesidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tescilli Tasar\u0131m:<\/strong> Bir \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn tasar\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n T\u00fcrk Patent ve Marka Kurumuna ba\u015fvurularak tescil edilmesidir. Tescilli tasar\u0131m 5 y\u0131l s\u00fcreyle koruma alt\u0131ndad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Tescilsiz Tasar\u0131m:<\/strong> Bir \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn tasar\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n ilk kez T\u00fcrkiye\u2019 de kamuya sunulmu\u015f ancak T\u00fcrk Patent ve Marka Kurumuna tescil ettirilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Tescilsiz tasar\u0131m 3 y\u0131l s\u00fcreyle koruma alt\u0131ndad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Bir \u00fcr\u00fcne ili\u015fkin tasar\u0131m\u0131n korunabilmesi i\u00e7in \u201cmutlak yenilik\u201d ve \u201cay\u0131rt edici nitelik\u201d kriterlerini ta\u015f\u0131mas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mutlak yenilik:<\/strong> Tasar\u0131m tescil ba\u015fvurusu yap\u0131lan \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn ba\u015fvuru veya r\u00fc\u00e7han tarihinden \u00f6nce d\u00fcnyan\u0131n herhangi bir yerinde kamuya sunulan tasar\u0131mlardan -yararlanma ve benzetme serbestisi ilkesi s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 i\u00e7inde kalmak kayd\u0131yla-<\/em> k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131n \u00f6tesinde farkl\u0131 \u00f6zelliklere sahip olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle d\u00fcnya \u00e7ap\u0131nda daha \u00f6nce kamuya hi\u00e7 sunulmamas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ay\u0131rt edici nitelik:<\/strong> Bir \u00fcr\u00fcne ait tasar\u0131m\u0131n bilgilenmi\u015f kullan\u0131c\u0131 \u00fczerinde b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 genel izlenim ile di\u011fer bir tasar\u0131m\u0131n b\u00f6yle bir kullan\u0131c\u0131da b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 genel izlenim aras\u0131ndaki belirgin bir farkl\u0131l\u0131kt\u0131r. \u00dcr\u00fcn\u00fcn ay\u0131rt edici \u00f6zelli\u011fi kalitesi de\u011fil, farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 6769 say\u0131l\u0131 S\u0131nai M\u00fclkiyet Kanunu m 56 “(1) Tasar\u0131m yeni ve ay\u0131rt edici niteli\u011fe sahip olmas\u0131 \u015fart\u0131yla bu Kanunla sa\u011flanan haklar kapsam\u0131nda korunur. … (4) Bir tasar\u0131m\u0131n ayn\u0131s\u0131; a) Tescilli tasar\u0131m i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuru veya r\u00fc\u00e7han tarihinden \u00f6nce, b) Tescilsiz tasar\u0131m i\u00e7in tasar\u0131m\u0131n kamuya ilk sunuldu\u011fu tarihten \u00f6nce, d\u00fcnyan\u0131n herhangi bir yerinde kamuya sunulmam\u0131\u015f ise o tasar\u0131m yeni kabul edilir. Tasar\u0131mlar sadece k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck ayr\u0131nt\u0131larda farkl\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6steriyorsa ayn\u0131 kabul edilir.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n 6769 say\u0131l\u0131 S\u0131nai M\u00fclkiyet Kanunu m 57 “(1) Kamuya sunma; sergileme, sat\u0131\u015f gibi yollarla piyasaya s\u00fcrme, kullanma, tarif, yay\u0131m, tan\u0131t\u0131m veya benzer ama\u00e7l\u0131 faaliyetleri kapsar.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yeni tasar\u0131m se\u00e7enek \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda tescil ba\u015fvurusundan \u00f6nce kamuya sunulmu\u015f tasar\u0131mlardan kanunun arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 mutlak yenilik ve ay\u0131rt edici \u00f6zelli\u011fi ayr\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle daha \u00f6nce kamuya sunulan tasar\u0131mlarla bilgilenmi\u015f kullan\u0131c\u0131lar nezdinde, yeni ve mutlak ay\u0131rt edici \u00f6zelli\u011fe, belirgin bir farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011fa sahip olmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yeni tasar\u0131m daha \u00f6nce kamuya sunulmu\u015f olan \u00fcr\u00fcnlerden renk, boyut, desen vs farkl\u0131l\u0131k arz etmeli, benzer olmamal\u0131, mutlak ay\u0131rt edici niteli\u011fi bulunmal\u0131, kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen mutlak yenilik kriterini ta\u015f\u0131mal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Daha \u00f6nce kamuya sunulmu\u015f \u00fcr\u00fcnlerle k\u0131yasland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kanunun arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 mutlak yenilik ve ay\u0131rt edicilik \u00f6zelli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131mayan ancak bir \u015fekilde end\u00fcstriyel tasar\u0131m olarak tescil edilmi\u015f \u00fcr\u00fcnlerle ilgili olarak tasar\u0131m\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc istenebilir. (SMK m 78) <\/p>\n\n\n\n 6769 say\u0131l\u0131 S\u0131nai M\u00fclkiyet Kanunu md 78 “(1) Tasar\u0131m\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, ikinci f\u0131krada say\u0131lan h\u00e2ller d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda menfaati olanlar taraf\u0131ndan istenebilir. … (4) H\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fck davas\u0131, dava tarihinde sicilde tasar\u0131m sahibi olarak kay\u0131tl\u0131 ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131r.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n Daha \u00f6nce kamuya sunulmu\u015f \u00fcr\u00fcnler her ne kadar tescil edilmi\u015f olsa da s\u00f6z konusu renk, boyut, desen ve \u00fcr\u00fcnlerin, T\u00fcrkiye’ de ve D\u00fcnya’ da, tasar\u0131m tescil tarihinden \u00f6nce \u00fcretilmesi, tan\u0131nmas\u0131, bilinmesi, kamuya sunulmas\u0131, pazarlanmas\u0131 nedeniyle tasar\u0131mlar\u0131n 6769 say\u0131l\u0131 S\u0131nai M\u00fclkiyet Kanununun 56. maddesinde tan\u0131mlanan yeni ve mutlak ay\u0131rt edicilik unsuru olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle 6769 say\u0131l\u0131 S\u0131nai M\u00fclkiyet Kanununun 78. maddesine istinaden h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ve sicilden terkinine, h\u00fckm\u00fcn ilan\u0131na karar verilmesi talepli dava a\u00e7\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yarg\u0131tay Kararlar\u0131 da buna i\u015faret etmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yarg\u0131tay 11. Hukuk Dairesi 2020\/362 E, 2021\/6947 K, \u201c…Dava, daval\u0131ya ait tasar\u0131m\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc istemine ili\u015fkindir. 6769 say\u0131l\u0131 SMK’n\u0131n 56\/4. ve 5. f\u0131kras\u0131; \u201cBir tasar\u0131m\u0131n ayn\u0131s\u0131; tescilli tasar\u0131m i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuru veya r\u00fc\u00e7han tarihinden \u00f6nce, tescilsiz tasar\u0131m i\u00e7in tasar\u0131m\u0131n kamuya ilk sunuldu\u011fu tarihten \u00f6nce, d\u00fcnyan\u0131n herhangi bir yerinde kamuya sunulmam\u0131\u015f ise o tasar\u0131m yeni kabul edilir. Tasar\u0131mlar sadece k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck ayr\u0131nt\u0131larda farkl\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6steriyorsa ayn\u0131 kabul edilir. Bir tasar\u0131m\u0131n bilgilenmi\u015f kullan\u0131c\u0131 \u00fczerinde b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 genel izlenim; tescilli tasar\u0131m i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuru veya r\u00fc\u00e7han tarihinden \u00f6nce, tescilsiz tasar\u0131m i\u00e7in tasar\u0131m\u0131n kamuya ilk sunuldu\u011fu tarihten \u00f6nce, kamuya sunulmu\u015f herhangi bir tasar\u0131m\u0131n ayn\u0131 kullan\u0131c\u0131 \u00fczerinde yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 genel izlenimden farkl\u0131 ise bu tasar\u0131m\u0131n ay\u0131rt edici niteli\u011fe sahip oldu\u011fu kabul edilir. Ay\u0131rt edici niteli\u011fin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde, tasar\u0131mc\u0131n\u0131n tasar\u0131m\u0131 geli\u015ftirmede sahip oldu\u011fu se\u00e7enek \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn derecesi dikkate al\u0131n\u0131r.” h\u00fckm\u00fc amirdir. 6769 say\u0131l\u0131 SMK’n\u0131n 58. maddesine g\u00f6re; \u201c(1) Tasar\u0131m sahibi, kendi tasar\u0131m\u0131na k\u0131yasla ay\u0131rt edici niteli\u011fe sahip olmayan tasar\u0131mlara kar\u015f\u0131 bu Kanundan do\u011fan haklar\u0131n\u0131 kullanabilir. (2) Koruma kapsam\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesinde, tasar\u0131mc\u0131n\u0131n tasar\u0131m\u0131 geli\u015ftirmede sahip oldu\u011fu se\u00e7enek \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn derecesi dikkate al\u0131n\u0131r.\u201d Bir tasar\u0131m\u0131n tescil edilebilmesi i\u00e7in, tasar\u0131m\u0131n ayn\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru veya r\u00fc\u00e7han tarihinden \u00f6nce d\u00fcnyan\u0131n herhangi bir yerinde kamuya sunulmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, bir ba\u015fka deyi\u015fle mutlak yenilik ko\u015fulu kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Mutlak yenilikten s\u00f6z edilebilmesi i\u00e7in de, tasar\u0131m tescil ba\u015fvurusu yap\u0131lan \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn d\u00fcnyan\u0131n herhangi bir yerinde kamuya sunulan tasar\u0131mlardan yararlanma ve benzetme serbestisi ilkesi s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 i\u00e7inde kalmak kayd\u0131yla, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131n \u00f6tesinde farkl\u0131 \u00f6zelliklere sahip olmas\u0131 gerekli ve yeterlidir. Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalardan da anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, tasar\u0131mlar i\u00e7in mutlak yenilik kriteri benimsendi\u011finden, h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fck davas\u0131nda bu y\u00f6n\u00fcn mahkemece re\u2019sen dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekir.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yarg\u0131tay 11. Hukuk Dairesi 2017\/2994 E, 2019\/361 K, \u201c…\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince, davac\u0131\/kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131n\u0131n end\u00fcstriyel tasar\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n yeni ve ay\u0131rt edici nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, harc\u0131 alem oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi ile kar\u015f\u0131 davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, tasar\u0131m\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne, bu nedenle de as\u0131l davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karara kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131\/kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 vekilince istinafa isteminde bulunulmu\u015ftur. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince, 554 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK\u2019n\u0131n 6. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, bir tasar\u0131m\u0131n tescil edilebilmesi i\u00e7in, tasar\u0131m\u0131n ayn\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru veya r\u00fc\u00e7han tarihinden \u00f6nce d\u00fcnyan\u0131n herhangi bir yerinde kamuya sunulmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, bir ba\u015fka deyi\u015fle mutlak yenilik ko\u015fulu kabul edildi\u011fi, mutlak yenilikten s\u00f6z edilebilmesi i\u00e7in de tasar\u0131m tescil ba\u015fvurusu yap\u0131lan \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn d\u00fcnyan\u0131n herhangi bir yerinde kamuya sunulan tasar\u0131mlardan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131n \u00f6tesinde farkl\u0131 \u00f6zelliklere sahip olmas\u0131 gerekli oldu\u011fu, 554 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK\u2019n\u0131n 7. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen tasar\u0131m\u0131n ay\u0131rt edicilik unsuru ise yeni olan bir tasar\u0131m\u0131 ortak \u00f6zelliklerinin d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ve bilgilenmi\u015f kullan\u0131c\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00fcyle k\u0131yaslanan di\u011fer tasar\u0131mlardan farkl\u0131 k\u0131lan ve b\u00f6ylece yeni olan bir tasar\u0131ma ayn\u0131 KHK\u2019n\u0131n 11. maddesi ile sa\u011flanan hukuki koruman\u0131n da kapsam\u0131n\u0131 belirleyen \u00f6zellik oldu\u011fu, somut olayda, davac\u0131\/kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 ad\u0131na tescilli has\u0131r \u00f6rg\u00fc tasar\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n bilirki\u015fi raporunda da vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere yeni ve ay\u0131rt edici nitelikte bulunmay\u0131p, anonim nitelikte bir tasar\u0131m oldu\u011fu, bu itibarla, mahkeme gerek\u00e7esi yerinde oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi ile davac\u0131\/kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 vekilinin istinaf isteminin esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. … B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131na karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu 2017\/12 E, 2020\/141 K, \u201c18. Tescilsiz tasar\u0131mlar\u0131n tasar\u0131m hukukuna g\u00f6re korunmas\u0131 ilk defa SMK ile d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f, b\u00f6ylece tasar\u0131m hukukunda hem tescilli hem de tescilsiz tasar\u0131mlar hukuken koruma alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. SMK\u2019n\u0131n 55\/4. maddesinde bu husus; \u201ctasar\u0131m; bu Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca tescil edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde tescilli tasar\u0131m, ilk kez T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de kamuya sunulmu\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde ise tescilsiz tasar\u0131m olarak korunur\u201d \u015feklinde ifade edilmi\u015ftir. 19. 554 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK\u2019n\u0131n 5. maddesi gere\u011fince, yeni ve ay\u0131rt edici tasar\u0131mlar belge verilerek korunur. Ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle bir tasar\u0131m\u0131n hukuken korunabilmesi i\u00e7in yeni ve ay\u0131rt edici niteli\u011fe sahip olmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu \u00f6zelli\u011fe sahip bir tasar\u0131m, be\u015fer y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcrelerle yenilenmek kayd\u0131yla yirmi be\u015f y\u0131l korunacakt\u0131r. 20. 554 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK\u2019n\u0131n 6. maddesi gere\u011fince, bir tasar\u0131m\u0131n ayn\u0131s\u0131, ba\u015fvuru veya r\u00fc\u00e7han tarihinden \u00f6nce d\u00fcnyan\u0131n herhangi bir yerinde kamuya sunulmam\u0131\u015f ise o tasar\u0131m yeni kabul edilir. Sadece k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck ayr\u0131nt\u0131larda farkl\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6steren tasar\u0131mlar ayn\u0131 say\u0131l\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re 554 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK ile bir tasar\u0131m\u0131n yeni say\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in o tasar\u0131m mutlak yenilik \u00f6zelli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131mas\u0131 gerekir. Mutlak yenilik kavram\u0131 ile s\u00f6z konusu tasar\u0131m\u0131n d\u00fcnya \u00e7ap\u0131nda daha \u00f6nce kamuya hi\u00e7 sunulmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 ifade edilmektedir. Ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle tasar\u0131mc\u0131, ba\u015fka bir tasar\u0131m\u0131n ayn\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 veya k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck farkl\u0131l\u0131k i\u00e7eren versiyonunu, tamamen o tasar\u0131mdan habersiz olarak tasarlasa, bu durumda dahi tasar\u0131m yeni say\u0131lmayacakt\u0131r. B\u00f6yle bir tasar\u0131ma her nas\u0131lsa tescil belgesi al\u0131nm\u0131\u015fsa belgenin h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc mahkemeden istenebilir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda var olan fikri \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc T\u00fcrkiye\u2019ye ilk kez getirerek onu sahiplenmek hukuken koruma g\u00f6rmez. 21. 554 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK\u2019n\u0131n 7\/I. maddesi gere\u011fince, bir tasar\u0131m\u0131n bilgilenmi\u015f kullan\u0131c\u0131 \u00fczerinde b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 genel izlenim ile di\u011fer bir tasar\u0131m\u0131n b\u00f6yle bir kullan\u0131c\u0131da b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 genel izlenim aras\u0131nda belirgin bir farkl\u0131l\u0131k varsa o tasar\u0131m ay\u0131rt edici niteli\u011fe sahiptir. Ay\u0131rt edici nitelik incelemesi, bir kalite testi olmay\u0131p farkl\u0131l\u0131k testidir. Bu nedenle bir tasar\u0131m\u0131n teknolojik ya da sanatsal a\u00e7\u0131dan di\u011ferlerine g\u00f6re daha d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck d\u00fczeyde olmas\u0131 onun ay\u0131rt edicili\u011fini etkilemez. Ayr\u0131ca ay\u0131rt edici nitelik ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131 yap\u0131l\u0131rken farkl\u0131l\u0131klara bak\u0131lmakla birlikte a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k k\u0131yaslanan tasar\u0131mlar\u0131n ortak \u00f6zelliklerine verilecektir. 22. Yenilik ve ay\u0131rt edici nitelik incelemesi, \u00f6zel veya teknik bilgiyi gerektiren bir husus olmas\u0131 nedeniyle bilirki\u015fi marifetiyle yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle yenilik ve ay\u0131rt edici nitelik incelemesi genel bilgi veya tecr\u00fcbeyle ya da h\u00e2kimlik mesle\u011finin gerektirdi\u011fi hukuk\u00ee bilgiyle \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmayan bir durumdur. Ayr\u0131ca h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fck davalar\u0131nda bilirki\u015fi deliline dayan\u0131lmas\u0131 durumunda bilirki\u015filer, resen yapacaklar\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131rma sonucunda elde edecekleri bilgi ve bulgular\u0131 da dosyaya sunacaklard\u0131r. Zira patent, faydal\u0131 model ve tasar\u0131mlarda d\u00fcnya \u00e7ap\u0131nda, yani mutlak yenilik aranmakta oldu\u011fundan bu durum kamu d\u00fczenindendir (Suluk, Cahit\/ Karasu, Rauf\/ Nal, Temel: Fikri M\u00fclkiyet Hukuku, Ankara, 2018, s. 316). … 27. Bir tasar\u0131m\u0131n yeni say\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in o tasar\u0131m\u0131n d\u00fcnya \u00e7ap\u0131nda daha \u00f6nce kamuya hi\u00e7 sunulmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bilirki\u015fi raporu ile daval\u0131 tasar\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n 1993 y\u0131l\u0131nda ABD’de kamuya sunulan 5,195,975 say\u0131l\u0131 patent kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda yenilik vasf\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edildi\u011fine g\u00f6re daval\u0131 tasar\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fck \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011funun kabul\u00fc gerekmektedir.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yarg\u0131tay 11. Hukuk Dairesi 2014\/14544 E, 2015\/473 K \u201cDava, daval\u0131 ad\u0131na tescilli end\u00fcstriyel tasar\u0131m tescil belgesinin yeni ve ay\u0131rtedici olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131na dayal\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fck istemine ili\u015fkindir. 554 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK\u2019n\u0131n 6\/1’inci maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca, bir tasar\u0131m\u0131n ayn\u0131s\u0131, ba\u015fvuru veya r\u00fc\u00e7han tarihinden \u00f6nce d\u00fcnyan\u0131n herhangi bir yerinde kamuya sunulmam\u0131\u015f ise o tasar\u0131m\u0131n yeni kabul edilece\u011fi, tasar\u0131mlar\u0131n sadece k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck ayr\u0131nt\u0131larda farkl\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6stermesi halinde ayn\u0131 say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan d\u00fczenlemeden anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, tasar\u0131m\u0131n tescile ba\u011flanabilmesi i\u00e7in, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de ve d\u00fcnyan\u0131n herhangi bir yerinde kamuya sunulmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, ba\u015fka bir anlat\u0131mla mutlak yeni olmas\u0131 ko\u015fulu kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Yenilik i\u00e7in olduk\u00e7a y\u00fcksek d\u00fczey arayan d\u00fczenleme h\u00fckm\u00fc dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, yenilik kriterinin mutlak oldu\u011fu, gerekti\u011finde mahkemece re\u2019sen ara\u015ft\u0131rma dahi yap\u0131labilece\u011fi, davac\u0131 kan\u0131tlar\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne ba\u015fvurulan bilirki\u015filerin, tasar\u0131m\u0131n yenili\u011fini ortadan kald\u0131ran harici bilgilerinin dahi de\u011ferlendirilece\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekmektedir. Bu husus, kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n KAYNAK\u00c7A<\/p>\n\n\n\n